전체글

These methods offer a helpful description of your perceptions and you may dating enjoy off U

These methods offer a helpful description of your perceptions and you may dating enjoy off U

Fundamentally, future browse of this type you will definitely talk about a great deal more rigorously how teens’ thinking, traditional, and you may facts determine the later on dating consequences due to the fact people. S. adolescents; not, extra research having fun with significantly more rigid lookup tips manage make it possible to influence if or not you will find causal links between teens’ very early matchmaking enjoy and you may thinking in addition to their relationships paths because the people. Just like the a lot more waves of one’s NLSY97 end up being offered you to stick to this cohort after that into adulthood, it more descriptive study of outcomes of teenage attitudes and you may experience and adult relationship consequences becomes much more fruitful.

Sources

Abma, J.C., G.Yards. Martinez, W.D. Mosher, and you will B.S. Dawson. “Children in america: Intercourse, Birth-control Use, and you can Childbearing, 2002.” Federal Center to own Fitness Analytics. Essential and you can Fitness Statistics, collection 23, zero. twenty four, .

Amato, Paul R. “People out of Separation in the 1990s: An improve of your Amato and you can Keith (1991) Meta-Study.” Record regarding Friends Psychology, vol. 15, zero. 3, 201, pp. 355-370.

Amato, Paul R., David R. Johnson, Alan Unit, and you will Stacy J. Rogers. “Continuity and alter in the .” Diary off , pp. 1-twenty two.

Amato, Paul R., Laura Spencer Loomis, and you may Alan Booth. “Parental Split up, Relationship Dispute, and you will Young ones Really-Being Throughout Early Adulthood.” Public Pushes, vol. 73, zero. 3, 1995, pp. 895-915.

Bachman, J.Grams., P.M. O’Malley, J.Age. Schulenberg, L.D. Johnston, A great.L. Bryant, and A great.C. Merline. The newest Reduction in Substance Include in More youthful Adulthood: Alterations in Social Facts, Roles, and you will Beliefs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Couples, 2002.

Bae, Yupin, Susan Choy, Claire Geddes, Jennifer Sable, and Thomas Snyder. “Trends into the Educational Equity off Ladies and you will Lady.” Arizona, DC: Federal Heart having Knowledge Analytics, 2000.

Bramlett, Yards.D., and you will W.D. Mosher. “Cohabitation, Relationships, Divorce case, and Remarriage in the usa.” National Cardio to have Fitness Statistics. Crucial and you will Wellness Analytics, series 23, no. 23, 2002.

Brewster, Karin L. and you can Irene Padavic. “Improvement in Gender-Ideology, 1977-1996: Brand new Contributions of Intracohort Transform and you can Society Tur, pp. 477-487.

Brown, Susan L., and you will Alan Booth. “Cohabitation Rather than Marriage: A comparison from Relationships Quality.” Journal out-of ily, vol. 58, 1996, pp. 668-678.

Buehler, Cheryl, Garrett Lange, and you may Karen L Franck. “Adolescents’ Cognitive and you will Emotional Answers in order to ent, vol. 73, no. step 3, 2007, pp. 775-789.

Bumpass, Larry and you will Hsien-Hen Lu. “Trends into the Cohabitation and you will Ramifications to own Kid’s Family relations Contexts about United states.” Inhabitants Studies, vol. 54, 2000, pp. 29-41.

Carver, K.P., K. Joyner, and you will J.Roentgen. Udry. “National Prices out of Teenage Romantic Matchmaking.” For the Adolescent Affairs and you will Sexual Choices: Idea, Search, and you may Fundamental Effects, modified because of the P. Florsheim. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Lovers, 2003.

Stores to have Disease Manage and Reduction (CDC). “Youth Risk Choices Surveillance – All of us, 2005.” Surveillance Information. Morbidity and Mortality Per week Statement, vol. 55, no. SS-5, .

The data exhibited inside statement would depend priines just how adolescents’ attitudes and you can matchmaking experience disagree across teams outlined by individuals group and private properties

Chandra, A beneficial., Grams.M. Martinez, W.D. Mosher, J.C. Abma, and J. Jones. Fertility, Household members Think, and Reproductive Health off You.S. Women: Studies on the 2002 Federal Questionnaire regarding Household members Gains. Crucial Health Statistics, Show 23, zero. twenty-five. Hyattsville, MD: Federal Cardio having Wellness Analytics.

Clarkberg, Marin wireclub. “The price of Integrating: The new Character off Financial Really-In Young Adults’ Very first Partnership Knowledge.” Public Pushes, vol. 77, zero. 3, 1999, pp. 945-968.

Cooksey, E C., Frank L. Mott, and you may Stefanie A good. Neubauer. 2002. “Friendships and Early Relationship: Website links to Sexual Initiation Certainly American Kids Created so you can Younger Moms and dads.” Views towards the Intimate and you will Reproductive Wellness, vol. 34, zero. step three, 2002, pp.118-126.

Crissey, Sarah R. 2005. “Race/Ethnic Differences in brand new Relationship Hopes of Kids: The newest Part regarding Personal Dating.” Log out of , pp. 697-709.

추주희

전남대학교 인문학연구원에서 HK연구교수로 재직 중이다. 전공분야는 계층사회학, 젠더와 가족사회학이며, 주요 관심분야는 소수자들의 생애와 노동, 섹슈얼리티, 페미니즘 이론 등이다.

답글 남기기

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다.

Back to top button